Channeling Grief and Anger into Advocacy and Acceptance

Mimi Feldman, Mindy Greiling and I have been co-hosting our podcast, Schizophrenia: Three Moms in the Trenches, for almost a year now. Our 32nd episode this week has garnered more YouTube viewings in its first two days than any other so far, and guest Jerri Clark, our " Fourth Mom in the Trenches" for this episode, is the reason.

If you want to know more, please subscribe to the podcast on itunes or wherever you get your podcasts, and/or on YouTube. Our facebook page is @schizophrenia3moms.

Here are some of the notes:

What if: the mental health system would pay more attention, take more steps to help , before tragedy, violence, or crime finally calls attention to symptoms of SMI (serious mental illness)?

What if Darrell Brooks (charged with murder after plowing his mother’s car into a parade in Wisconsin) had been helped, and treated, instead of ignored or imprisoned? His mother, Dawn Woods, wrote a letter to the media. She, too, is a “mom in the trenches”. So is journalist/advocate/mindfulness coach Jerri Clark, our guest for this episode.

What if Jerri’s son Calvin had received treatment, despite his “civil right ”to refuse it - although the refusal itself is a symptom of his illness?

She says: 

“I watched my son delivered into society’s underbelly by design. He spent months homeless, met law enforcement again and again, and tried multiple times to die. These traumas are part of a tragic inventory of the requirements for public assistance when someone has a serious mental illness”

Oprah, Harry, and Schizophrenia: The “Me” My Son Still Can’t See

The Me You Can’t See

Have you seen the new docuseries on AppleTV+, “The Me You Can’t See”

First of all, thank you, Oprah and Prince Harry, for joining the ranks of advocates who are becoming more open, honest, transparent about mental health issues, barriers, and some solutions. In this 5-part series, people from celebs (like Lady Gaga to the Prince himself)  to “regular folk” talk about trauma, challenges, heartbreak, and where they are now.

This is brave. This is eye-opening. This will help some folks, diagnosed with mental health issues (or those who know, treat, or love them) to understand and know they aren’t alone.

Thank you.

And yet. 

Does it go far enough? 

I am hoping for a second series, where more illnesses are explored, uncovered. Especially schizophrenia in those who have yet to be aware that they have the illness.

As we’ve covered often in our podcast, Schizophrenia: Three Moms in the Trenches, and in the books and blogs we share, one of the hardest things about schizophrenia is that the first step often can’t be taken: the step of awareness. Anosognosia is the condition that keeps Ben, and countless others like him, shielded from that awareness - and from accepting treatment unless somehow coerced into it (even by love).

Oprah and Harry - next time - and I do hope there will be a next time - please talk to the families of those affected by severe mental illness.

This is the episode I’m waiting to see: the person diagnosed with schizophrenia who has yet to be aware of it. Along with the family members who still love them and feel powerless to help.

We cry, we fiercely guard, we coerce, we lose sleep, we go broke.

We live through grief, live sometimes in fear, we lose our own futures, and  we bounce back a zillion times - all in the name of love, and in the hope that more people - researchers, practitioners, lawmakers, first responders - will learn from our heartbreak and advocacy, and continue to prioritize (and fund) services and science  that will help our loved ones, and our families.

Ben (my son), as you may know from following this blog, recently was released from a nearly-six-month psychiatric hospital stay (almost unheard of in this country) and has slipped from a relatively normal life of work and semi-independence to one of a group home bed and starting from scratch. 

Still, he does not believe that going off his meds had anything to do with the breakdown he experienced in August. He refuses to go back on the meds that he was treated with when he managed to have a clearer semblance of a life. The light is no longer there in his eyes, but he doesn’t feel the difference. 

While he has said he “struggles with symptoms”, he won’t say what those symptoms are. He becomes paranoid and cagey if I ever bring it up. I’ve learned not to.

I’ve learned to appreciate whatever crumbs of my child I can get, and am grateful every day that he is in a place (for now) with a staff trained to help him - even if he refuses much of that help.

According to NAMI,  

When we talk about anosognosia in mental illness, we mean that someone is unaware of their own mental health condition or that they can’t perceive their condition accurately. Anosognosia is a common symptom of certain mental illnesses, perhaps the most difficult to understand for those who have never experienced it.

This is what makes schizophrenia so difficult to treat - the “rights” of patients to refuse the treatment that would help them the most. 

If we applied these “rights” to our parents or other loved ones with dementia or Alzheimer's, they’d be living in an unsafe world. So we don’t allow that to happen.

Well, untreated, so is Ben. And so are the families of people diagnosed with SMI (serious mental illness). 

When you cover schizophrenia by interviewing someone who is in treatment, and aware of their own illness, you don’t tell the whole story.

This is the episode I’m waiting to see: the person diagnosed with schizophrenia who has yet to be aware of it. Along with the family members who still love them and feel powerless to help.

Thanks, though (really, I mean this sincerely), for the brave steps you have taken so far.
Let’s keep going.

Finally...A New Word About Antipsychotics and Weight Gain

If you were asked to take a medication (for an illness you don’t believe you have) and warned that the side effects might include:

• fatigue

• drooling

• sexual disfunction and

• weight gain,

would you take it?

Silly question. 

And, to paraphrase the famous movie line, “You had me (saying hell, no!) at weight gain.”

Seriously.

Still so much to learn

This has been one of the reasons my son hates to take his meds, and refuses or pretends to swallow them whenever possible.  For years, we have worked around this, but yes. I get why.

Finally, though, there is some explanation about the weight gain, which may lead to more research and better medications.

According to new research,  the problem is  in " blocking certain dopamine receptors, known as D2-like receptors.” This is how most antipsychotics work.

But – and I never knew this before (not a neuroscientist, but I sure feel like one sometimes) - “the body actually has more dopamine receptors outside the brain than within it”.

Whoa! This is according to Dr. Zachary Freyberg, the senior researcher on the new study.

And where are these receptors? Many are in the pancreas, too, and “when the researchers used antipsychotic medications to block the pancreatic cells' D2-like receptors, that ramped up the production of both glucagon and insulin. In the body, unchecked release of those hormones could quickly lead to a loss in insulin sensitivity and chronically high blood sugar levels.”

So – the weight gain my son experiences when on these meds is not his fault.

So what now?

Researchers are looking to find new meds that don’t block dopamine, and find other ways.

Wouldn’t that be nice? Please, yes, more research, new treatments. Save our loved ones.

In the meanwhile, I will add that three things have helped my son keep his weight gain to minimum: physical exercise (he lost at least ten pounds when he began to work as a restaurant server), keeping the carb intake down (not so easy for a vegetarian, but the more he used vegetables and fruits the healthier he got), and keeping an eye on boredom eating.  the busier he is, the better his eating.

This isn’t earthshattering news for any of us watching our weight – but it has been nice to see that even on psych meds these methods can help.  

Still – when he lost his job due to Covid crash (economic, not medical), his activity went down and boredom went up.

So – please – keep that research coming.

And thanks for some good news.

Schizophrenia: Back in the Spotlight at Last?

Oprah's latest book selection, a new memoir, and HBO's series with Mark Ruffalo - is schizophrenia finally going to get the attention it deserves?

Of all the SMIs (Serious Mental Illnesses) in the news lately, schizophrenia always seems to get the short shrift; it’s like the last mental illness in the closet. 

Unless, of course, there’s a horrific incident of violence. Then the questions about sanity begin...and often finger-pointing at schizophrenia. And then, advocates like me have to bring out the statistics to defend our loved ones: 

• No, schizophrenics are not “more violent”

• No, schizophrenia does not mean “split personality”

• No, it’s not the fault of “bad parenting”.

Currently, this brain illness is back in vogue with three exciting spotlights:

Will these open eyes at last?

Will these open eyes at last?

1. Oprah’s book club selection is Hidden Valley Road by Robert Kolker - about a family with 12 children - 6 of whom developed schizophrenia

2. HBO has begun airing the mini-series based on the wonderful (and devastating) Wally Lamb Novel, I Know This Much Is True.

3. A new memoir is to be released next month:, He Came In With It, by Mimi Feldman

And still, the myths - and lack of attention to research - continue. As fellow author and advocate Feldman points out in her forthcoming book and a recent guest blog post for Pete Earley, 

A huge question looms:

"Why is bringing those with schizophrenia (and other serious mental illnesses) simply to a state of zombie-like compliance considered a success?"

I have my theories, one of which is this: many don’t see people with schizophrenia as save-able, or - worse -  worth saving. Because the illness often robs them of so much besides reality: their joy, their charm, their ability to empathize.

Still, those of us who love someone with this devastating illness, who knew them before it took hold,  can attest to the fact that they are worth saving. They are locked up inside that shell. We love them, and occasionally we see what could be - if only we could find a CURE, not just a management tool.

Right now, as we all struggle with our own kinds of isolation in this covid-19 surreal life, imagine what it might be like to feel that isolated all the time. In the words of Willy Loman in Death of a Salesman, ATTENTION MUST BE PAID.

Let’s hope these three works of art will propel us toward the changes we need to see - and help bring our loved ones with schizophrenia the respect, love, and CURE that they deserve.

We’d give anything to see their joy again.

Treatment Pays Off in Schizophrenia, Even if "Unwanted"

One young man with schizophrenia makes the news this week because he attacked his parents with a rock. The Mom says "I am afraid of my own son now." According to the article, their son was refusing the treatment and medication available to him from the Kentucky assertive community treatment program. The treatment was voluntary. The young man said "no thanks." And nearly killed his parents.

My son, Ben, also diagnosed with schizophrenia (and a very severe case, I am told), gently lifts his baby niece out of her swing, sings a silly baby song to her and gets a huge smile from her in return. Then he showers, shaves, irons his shirt, and heads off to work.  He has been a server at the same restaurant - full-time - for over two years.

In Ireland, a man is finally committed to a mental health facility - after killing his parents with an axe. This treatment comes, obviously, way too late.

My son's phone constantly rings with texts from friends, who are trying to arrange a "game night" at home fortomorrow evening. Now he has friends again - but it took years to rebuild relationships, after years lost to hospitalizations and periods of relapse. We hope he never again needs that level of help. If Ben continues with treatment, we may get our wish. But there is no guarantee when it comes to mental health. This we know, all too well.

Five years ago, right after my book Ben Behind his Voices was published, Ben went off his medication and went back into the hospital for the eighth time. It took seven weeks to engage his willingness to "go back on meds", after which he moved back in with us - with strict rules to "follow psychiatrist instructions." Why? There was no other way we'd allow him to live with us.

some of the latest info on schizophrenia treatment

The truth is: treatment makes all the difference. That's why we, Ben's family, "require" it in order for him to live with us. And, yes, we supervise it - staying up until 1 or 2 AM five nights a week to do so. Because, without this, we might have to be frightened of our own son too. Instead, our biggest problems resemble those of parents raising a growing teen - messy bedroom, sloppy compliance with curfews, uneducated financial decisions - even though Ben is 34 years old.  Not always fun, but we'll take this level of challenge. It's annoying at worst. With one in four families dealing with mental illness in a loved one, I know many who would give anything to have "problems" like ours instead of the stigma, guilt, helplessness, grief and fear they experience every day.

Oh, we are not without fear. We feel like our life is lived with fingers crossed - because two days without treatment would change everything. We've seen it happen before.

Ben is still rebuilding his life - and his treatment is a huge part of that journey. Without it, all he has built could topple like that first straw house in the story of The Three Pigs.Treatment works - and in our case it simply cannot be "voluntary." We won't allow it.

We know what we'd have to do if Ben were to suddenly refuse treatment - refuse to allow him to live with us - and it's terrifying.We've done it before, much earlier in this process, before we understood his diagnosis. Ben was homeless for five months when he was 19 - and the threat of having to live in a shelter again is what got him to agree to treatment a decade ago.

Since then, he has slowly reclaimed his life - with the four pillars of community, purpose, structure and (yes) treatment. If any one of these pillars should crumble...well, let's just hope that never happens. Because right now Ben has a life. As he recently said to me, "I finally like who I am right now. I have a life I'm proud of. And if meds have something to do with that, so be it."

…but not disaster, if we catch it in time!

Wahoo! Does he mean it? I can't be sure. He has said this before, right before he'd been placed in his own apartment five years ago and left to "manage his illness alone." The result was the eighth hospital stay, during which his "without meds" behaviors became uncharacteristically belligerent.

So we still will adhere to our process for treatment, simply because it is working. Ben deserves treatment - and he deserves to have it supervised and reinforced if that's what he needs. There are those who will argue that he has a right to "refuse treatment."  Well, I say he has a right to have a life. With treatment, that life is filled with family, friends, love, work, a social life, a chance to mature and make decisions for himself - and a baby niece whose face lights up when she sees her Uncle Ben.

Treatment is far from perfect, but it can work. Keep improving it, make it available, fund it, enforce it. So no family has to ever be afraid of someone they love. 

What if Target's Sweater Poked "Fun" at Cancer?

What if it said “Christmas cancer. My spending is growing uncontrollably”?

Is really "just a shirt"?

This week, social media has been abuzz with two "holiday" issues so far: the Starbucks Cup ( and there's not much left to say) and a sweater still being sold by Target which amusingly ( to their buyers, I suppose) calls O.C.D. "Obsessive Christmas Disorder.

"Mental Health Advocates are up in arms about this "joke", which not only trivializes a serious and sometimes debilitating condition, but in doing so spreads misunderstanding and stigma. Target is refusing to remove the sweater from its racks, and its supporters say "oh, get a life, it's just a harmless joke."

But what if the sweater read:

 I have Christmas

Cancer.

My spending just keeps growing out of control.

I ask you, what then? Would anyone be supporting Target's "right to make a joke"?

I have a sense of humor. My son has schizophrenia, another serious mental illness, and after years we can finally laugh together about parts of his past. But the key word is: together. We laugh with, not at. 

OCD is not "cute." It's not Monk wanting to keep his shoes in a row and the carpet clean.  Some are able to manage the symptoms, but many are not, and this illness prevents them from living a productive life. For those who struggle to manage this, or any other serious illness, it's not a laughing matter - unless you have earned the right to laugh with, not at, perhaps struggling with the illness yourself - and then only if the time is right.

No one needs a healthy person wearing a sweater that trivializes the condition of someone who is not.

I recently went through a year of physical therapy to regain the ability to walk, and laughter has helped...but not laughing AT. Only in the physical therapy room, or with my family and friends who have helped me through, was humor appropriate - and actually quite welcome. But if anyone were to make fun of me, or wear a shirt that said "I am crippled for Christmas: My credit card has limitations", I would be annoyed at the trivialization of my pain.

laughing at oneself is very different from laughing at someone else.

Mental illness is still a physical illness; it's in the brain. If you wouldn't make fun of cancer, Target, don't make fun of OCD, schizophrenia, PTSD, bipolar, or any other illness of the brain.

Pull those sweaters now.

Thank You, John Oliver. And I apologize.

Wow. John Oliver just summed up the problems with our mental health system in 11 minutes and 54 seconds - with plenty of room for punchlines as well. I know - seems like something that isn't humorous. But this segment provides more respect for mental health issues than so many others I've seen. Well-placed humor can do that.

Watch it here:

His opening statement, like all the facts in this comedy-in-truth piece, is correct:

"It seems there is nothing like a mass shooting to suddenly spark political interest in mental health."

Guilty as charged. My last post was, yes, sparked by yet another act of violence that I suspected would eventually point back to an unaddressed mental health problem in the shooter (and lack of support for his family). After receiving 2 comments which were too extreme to approve, I almost deleted the post today. It seems to have sparked stigma and judgment instead of the empathy and constructive outrage I had hoped to inspire.  But I will let it remain in this thread, because while I myself may have jumped the gun on "judging" this shooter with expectations that attention should have been paid to his mental health way before a crisis, I also know that such judgment harms people like my son, who lives in fear that people will find out he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia. (for the record, his name and identifiable facts have been changed in the book and in my posts, with his permission to tell the story that way)

So let's be reminded of the following facts, in Rolling Stone's coverage of the segment:

"The aftermath of a mass shooting might actually be the worst time to talk about mental health," he argues. "Because, for the record, the vast majority of mentally ill people are non-violent. And the vast majority of gun violence is committed by non-mentally ill people." The host cites a February 2015 report by the American Journal of Public Health, which states that "fewer than 5 percent of the 120,000 gun-related killings … were perpetrated by people diagnosed with mental illness."

Yes. Let's not stigmatize those with mental health issues every time a crime like this occurs. But also, yes. Let's pay attention to our broken system - and fix it. Segments like John's, factual as well as (weird but wonderfully true) entertaining, point the way.

Chris Harper Mercer: A Preventable Tragedy?

Another merciless, senseless shooting, this time in Oregon. Another troubled shooter with three names. As details of the life of Chris Harper Mercer emerge on news outlets, I expect, sooner or later, to find out what often is uncovered: undiagnosed and/or untreated mental illness symptoms. Duh. And a family left trying to "handle it" alone. Duh, again. Been there - am there. Except we got some education and support so we could try to help our son. We are among the very lucky families. At the moment.

As mother to a young man who has been diagnosed, and is (reluctantly but consistently) in treatment for a mental illness (schizophrenia), my heart goes out not only to victims and their families, but also to the family of this latest shooter. His father, Ian Mercer, of Tarzana, California, told KTLA on Thursday night: "I am just as shocked as anybody at what happened today".

Once again, the system closed its eyes to the need for support and left a family alone to cope.

Chris Harper Mercer was also, according to a NY Times article, close to his mother, with whom he lived. She reportedly had asked neighbors to help her get her apartment exterminated for roaches that bothered her son, who was "dealing with some mental issues."  How else was she trying to help him? Or, like so many other stigmatized families with a "troubled" relative, did she just hope she could keep the situation quiet and keep things under control?

She obviously could not. Neither could Adam Lanza's mother, Nancy Lanza, in Newtown CT. Once your child is a legal adult, the very few rights you had as a guardian disappear completely. But the problem does not. And tragedy, as we have seen way too many times, can result. Though this kind of violence is NOT the norm for those with mental illness, it is the most publicized result of the neglect of our system toward the 1 in 4 families left to cope with mental illness alone.

When will we ever learn?

When will we pay attention to warning signs?

When will we open our eyes to the need for treatment, and put a system in place to help the families left to "figure it out" themselves?

We are one of those families.  For the past four years, Ben has lived with us, because the system failed to realistically help him stay in treatment and rebuild his life.  The minute he started to succeed, budget cuts took away services he supposedly "no longer needed." That is like stopping chemotherapy halfway through, with no follow-up.

We are Ben's family and we love him. So much so, that we're willing to let him "hate" us during the two most uncomfortable moments of the day: times to take medication that he does not believe he needs. We stay up late to supervise when he gets home from his job, often between 1 and 3 AM.  There are nights when I can barely stay awake, and cannot relax until the meds are safely swallowed and absorbed.

But it's worth it. The stability of consistent treatment has helped Ben to rebuild his life. He has a job, friends, and a car and credit card in his name (!). He is starting to feel like he has a life he's proud of. But he hates those two times a day...and I have no doubt that, were we not there, he would stop treatment immediately.  He has his reasons, one of which is he wants to take full credit for his "better decisions" lately. He does NOT want to hear that his good track record "seems to coincide" with times he takes his medications.

He melts down every so often, accuses us of controlling his life, of mistakenly labeling him "insane" (his word, never mine). He then says he wants to stop taking medication -with the best of intentions to keep succeeding, of course - but we have seen, eight times, what happens when treatment stops. It's not pretty. Hallucinations. Withdrawal. Resistance. Mania. Police. Ambulances. Sometimes handcuffs. Hospitals. Work, school, money, friends - all can be lost so quickly . So we let him hate us, twice a day.

Ben has never been violent - for that we are so grateful. He hates guns, and loves people. So, no, I don't fear he would become a shooter. But I do fear for his life, and his future. If we should stop managing his treatment (someday he might simply refuse, or we might be away, and - let's face it- parents do die eventually...) where would he go? How could he function? Would his "case management team" even have an idea what is going on? Would he get in his car and drive in a distracted state?

Every family dealing with mental illness lives on a tightrope, with an anvil suspended overhead ready to fall - because there IS NO SUPPORT.

We cannot close our eyes to the people who live with mental illness. We cannot sell them guns. We cannot deny them treatment - not just medical treatment, but services and support. We cannot play ostrich and "hope things get magically better."

According to a guest commentary, Treatment Advocacy Center, "The number of psychiatric beds in the US has been reduced in the last 50 years from about 650,000 to about 65,000—about equivalent to the number of mentally ill that wound up on the streets or in prison."

Or living with their frightened, hopeful, families. Attention must be paid.  

Sons with Schizophrenia: A Tale of Three Mothers

Three mothers with so much in common, we could form a club. Each raised one son and one daughter, through adolescence into young adulthood. Each loves her children with all her heart. And, sadly, each of our brilliant, happy, sweet sons began to change in their mid-teens, and were eventually diagnosed with schizophrenia. We have each written about our experiences, shared our stories so they might help others.

But our stories have taken three very different turns. Today, one of these mothers mourns the death of her son, who passed away in “individual housing” earlier this year. Another of us sits stoically in a courtroom as her son is being tried for shooting moviegoers in Aurora, Colorado. And I, the lucky one, get to hug my son as he heads off to work, in his car, filled with gas that he paid for himself. For today, yes, I am the lucky one.

Love matters…but it’s not enough

My heart goes out to the other mothers, even though I have never met them. I only know them through their writings, but I feel their struggles, their pain, their guilt, their love. Anyone who lives with mental illness in their family knows that we live life with crossed fingers, and we fight with all our might to make the right decisions.

And it is far from easy.

Laura Pogliano called herself “lucky”, too, sharing her story The Fortunate Mother: Caring for a Son with Schizophrenia in USA Today in 2014. In it, she “feels lucky that she's been able to hang in, lucky that Zac is not living in jail or under a bridge…even though ‘Twice a year, right in front of me, he disappears into psychosis, and there is very little left of who he is. Then medicine resurrects him for a few months, I have much of my child back, then he dies again.' “ 

Later, she struggled with whether or not to let Zac get his own apartment.  In a USA Today follow-up story, Laura says Zac had moved into an apartment near her home, and that she had tried to “protect her son without being overprotective.” Zac stopped communicating with her for a few days, and she had the same reaction as many parents who strive to allow independence with limits: “I asked myself, 'How much do I baby him? If he's with some friends, I don't want to butt in.' ''

Who hasn’t been there? I know I have. That balance between letting go and stepping in is a staple of parenting. In Laura’s case, the results were tragic: Zac was found dead in his apartment in January 2015. Her “luck” had run out…but the lack of respect and services for her family situation is certainly more to blame than luck.

Laura is devoting much of her time now to honoring Zac’s life with her advocacy. This did not have to happen. See her powerful piece called My Mentally Ill Son versus Your Son With Another Type of Illness.

Young Holmes Family

Holmes Family Today

Arlene Holmes is the mother of a man who is hated by many. Her son, “Jim” is known to us for only one thing : the day he opened fire in a crowded movie theater in Aurora, Colorado, killing 12 and wounding 70. James Eagan Holmes, before that day, was a neuroscience student, a camp counselor, a church goer, a class leader, a big brother. He was – and is – somebody’s son. And he had needed help for a long time.I don’t profess to understand how Arlene Holmes feels. I can only imagine the guilt, regret, isolation and grief – and surmise that these feelings began long before the “Batman incident”, when her son first began to show early behavior changes (including a suicide attempt at age 11). What I imagine to be the feelings behind the stoic expression of Arlene and her husband as they sit near their son during his trial comes from her self-published book of poetry When the Focus Shifts, her reaction to the shootings, and the arrest and trial of her son. She states that the proceeds are to be donated to medical and mental health services.

Is she a “monster”, who “raised a monster”? I doubt it. I suspect that she, like me and Laura, was just a woefully underprepared and unsupported parent.

She writes:

(01-08-2013) I can never forgive myself for not knowing that this would happen.

How could I have known?...

Forgive yourself…And then forgive the people who hate your guts and want you dead.

(02-01-2013) I had a good kid who never harmed anyone.

That changed; his brain changed.

(03-22-2013)

A memory of when he was in high school…we are hiking up a hill

I can’t keep up.

Jim stays behind to make sure I am okay.

Isn’t that empathy?

Arlene writes about sitting in Jim’s untouched childhood room, “because I need the memories and tangible evidence that he was a good person.” Could this have been me? Could it have been Laura?  Three mothers – three sons with schizophrenia.

What made the difference?

Is it love? I highly doubt it. These boys were all loved.

Is it the lack of family education and support? Shortage of attention paid to early diagnosis and treatment? Is it the fear of diagnosis, fed by stigma, fear, and paucity of realistic access to treatment that must be consistent to be effective? Answer: sadly, all of the above.

Or is it also just the randomness of things, the moments we missed when we look back and say, “I wish I had known?” To this I say: you can never know. You can guess. You can educate yourself. You can take whatever actions seem right, do what the mental health system “allows” you to do. But nothing is ever that clear where mental illness is concerned.

“Show me a prison, show me a jail
Show me a prisoner, man, whose face is growin' pale
And I'll show you a young man with many reasons why
And there but for fortune, may go you or I”
- Phil Ochs

Is it fortune? Really? According to a 2006 study, “An estimated 56 percent of state prisoners, 45 percent of federal prisoners, and 64 percent of jail inmates have a mental health problem.” So can we also blame a mental health system that is underfunded, shortsighted, and mired in legalities that prevent people with mental illness – and their concerned families - from getting the help they need?

I’m talking with George, a social worker who works in the prison system, about this. He says that, yes, many of his prison clients have schizophrenia. We agree that so many of those with unmanaged mental illness wind up instead either homeless or in prison, and that they’d have been better served by receiving treatment, as early and consistently as possible – but then George shocks me with his next statement. He says:

Of course, the majority of my guys are imprisoned for killing their parents.

This stops me in my tracks, knocks me right off my soapbox. There but for fortune…?I have often imagined how hard it would be if Ben were incarcerated (which almost happened), institutionalized (which also almost happened), or homeless (which did happen, in the past) – but the thought that he could kill us, or anyone, in the midst of psychosis has never crossed my mind. Ben is a gentle and sweet soul – has been since birth – and I’ve always felt that this has been our saving grace. But did Arlene Holmes think her son incapable of violence? Did Laura Pogliano think she was through the worst of it when Zac admitted he had schizophrenia and agreed to be interviewed by USA Today?

The truth is, I have no idea what Ben’s voices tell him when he is untreated . He has never admitted to even hearing voices, much less the words he hears, but if he stops taking medication the fact that he responds to this internal world is undeniably clear. We only hear and see Ben’s side of the “conversation” – he gestures, grimaces, talks – but what do the voices say to him? I hope we never know, We’ve made it our job to make sure he stays in treatment, keeping that internal world quiet enough so Ben can work, live and love in the external world. We have no “legal” right to do this, of course; it’s simply a house rule, and Ben follows it. We have set limits in our home and we enforce them. So far, so good.

These days, Ben has a job he excels at, a social life with friends and family, and interests like hiking, bowling, and college classes. He takes his medication twice daily, which we supervise. Not my favorite moments in the day, but worth it. Every day he asks for a “Mom hug”, and tells me he loves me. Lucky family. We know it. But we live life with crossed fingers. All we can do is our best to make sure we respect his illness enough to keep it managed.  And the rest…is out of our hands.

There but for fortune….and one hell of a continuous fight. For treatment, for research, for respect for the needs of those with mental illness, the right to have treatment and the right to a future.

Three mothers.

Three stories.

Three outcomes.

Countless other families that could have been saved – including those of who have lost loved ones – with early diagnosis, stigma-free treatment, understanding, better research, mental health support services.

When will we ever learn?

The Stupidity of Medicare: Saving Pennies, Risking Lives in Mental Health Care

It took ten years for us to find a medication regime that not only works to help manage the symptoms of my son Ben's schizophrenia, but that he is willing to take consistently. Ten years.  Three of those have taken place after where our book, Ben Behind His Voices, leaves off - in what one reader calls "open-ended hope."  At that time, Spring of 2011, Ben was in a group home, stable for long enough to begin to piece his life back together, but still finding any possible opportunity to "cheek" his meds. He hated taking them, didn't think he needed them, was discouraged by the side effects.

Rebuilding Your Life with Mental Illness: Delicate

Finally, though, a few months after the book was published, Ben had a relapse (see Revolving Door post) and it took a lot of teamwork to get him back on the meds that work - teamwork that included Ben himself, and that's why it was effective.

What helped Ben to agree? There is a different form of one of his meds that was much easier for Ben to swallow, literally, and that he swears has no side effects. This is a liquid suspension that has to be created by the pharmacist. Does it have fewer side effects? Who knows? But Ben believes that it does, and that's what matters. He felt like - and was/is - a part of the decision that affects his life every day. The empowerment is definitely a contributing factor in Ben's adherence to his medication regime.

And now, the main medication that Ben takes is no longer covered by Medicare. At least not in the formulation that Ben is willing to take, in the formulation that he can tolerate. In order to save money, they will not cover the extra ingredients needed to create the liquid version. Pills do not work. He cannot take them, physically or emotionally. Without this specific form of his meds, Ben could lose every single thing he has fought for so long to achieve. His job. His social life. His car.

The result of the stability of consistency with his treatment? Ben has continued to rebuild his future; in fact, he has far surpassed the modest hopes presented at the end of my book. Yes, despite the severity of his schizophrenia (many doctors told me that his case is "very severe"), Ben not only continues to attend community college, but now has held a job as a restaurant waiter for ten months! He is one of the best waiters there, the only one who has customers come in and request to sit in his section.

He, also miraculously, has started to have a social life. He has friends. And he is driving a used car that he saved very slowly for. It's not fancy, but it has added to the fact that he is now feeling like a man. Though he now lives with us, he has earned the position of no longer feeling embarrassed by his life. Sure, he has to be home twice a day for us to supervise his medication, but it's a small price for us all to pay, for the fact that he is feeling good about himself, realistically, for the first time in forever.

All it takes, as we know all too well from experience, is two days without his treatment and he will be back in the Emergency Room, waiting for a bed in the psych unit. (This has happened eight times before.  Trust us. Only two days to go from employable to certifiable).

We Need Foresight, not Band-Aids!

So - I offered to pay for those extra ingredients myself. $80 per month. Not so bad - for me. But what if Ben were alone, no family to support him, living on the meager disability payments that are supposed to cover room and board but do not? Do you think he could find $80 per month? Can others in that situation? No. So the result would be: not taking the medication. It's one step off a very steep cliff - and the fall is not pretty.

Unfortunately, my relief that $80 per month (challenging to find, but we'd manage) would solve our problem was short lived. The pharmacy called back to tell me that it is illegal to charge me for part of a medication. We have to pay for the whole medication - hundred of dollars per month. The only other choice? He has to take the pills, and Medicare will only cover one formulation of those: the ones that Ben finds impossible to swallow. We do NOT have hundreds of dollars available per month after bills are paid. Most families don't. But what choice do we have? This is NOT FAIR - to Ben, or to us.

Why did Medicare make this coverage change? To "cut corners", to "save a few bucks." But, in doing so, they are risking - no, endangering- my son's life.

How stupid and shortsighted can you get? While Ben is not violent by nature, others with untreated schizophrenia can be. Or their intentions are good, but the "voices" convince them that violent actions will lead to the good outcomes they desire.

How many shootings in movie theaters do we need to know that we need to provide treatment for mental illness? How many news stories of untreated schizophrenia (despite desperate families begging for hospital beds, enough days of help, enough support for staying in treatment and taking steps to recover one's life and dignity) does it take to get smart? To provide support for a chance at recovery?

Deeds: “The system failed my son”

When mental illness goes untreated, lives are endangered. The lives of those living with the illness (who wind up in jail, homeless, or dead), and the lives of those they could hurt in the attempt to obey their hallucinations. Aurora: untreated mental illness. The attack and suicide of Senator Creigh Deeds' son Gus: no beds available in psych units for the help they begged for. Virginia Tech shootings, the Unibomber's plans, the list goes on and on.

Treatment could have helped them. Treatment could have prevented tragedy. Saving pennies is not the answer. Provide treatment, structure, community, and purpose: the four pillars of recovery I will explore in my next book, Ben Beyond His Voices.

Meds alone do not change lives challenged by mental illness. But, for many, they sure do help provide the stability that is needed to rebuild futures. Take this away from my son - or even change the routine - and his carefully structured rebuilt life can come tumbling down faster than you can say "tax break."  Too many federal and state budgets are cutting mental health funding to make the numbers look better. And look at what happens every single time you try that ploy. Lives are lost, and much more money is spent on the tragic results of this lack of foresight.

Prevention is cheaper than tragedy. Medicare, Don't be stupid. Let my son, and others like him, have the treatment they deserve. Give him back the meds that work. Let him continue to be the taxpayer he has fought so hard to become.

What's the Difference When Your Child's Illness is in the Brain? "Sympathy"

60 minutes recently did a segment on the plight of families dealing with mental illness.  They interviewed many families and healthcare professionals in Connecticut, on how our system fails our Mentally Ill Youth in Crisis.

Deeds: “The system failed my son”

Virginia State Senator Creigh Deeds speaks out about how he was attacked by his son Gus, who suffered with schizophrenia. Virginia state senator Creigh Deeds suffered multiple stab wounds, and his 24-year-old son Gus died from an apparent self-inflicted gunshot in what police are considering an attempted murder-suicide.

Read more: Virginia State Senator Creigh Deeds' Son Evaluated and Released Before Stabbing | TIME.comhttp://nation.time.com/2013/11/19/before-senators-stabbing-a-shortage-of-psychiatric-beds/#ixzz2rzmupJD6

Connecticut families, in the continued aftermath of the Newtown shootings, still face the same issues of lack of beds, a revolving-door mental health system, and lack of support and help.

How I wish they had interviewed me, too - but the stories of Deeds and the other families are heartbreakingly similar. Sadly, the story in my book is not unique. Many suffer the same issues we do, every day, without support or even understanding.

In the "overtime" segment about stigma, a group of families shares the effect of stigma on their experience, and how a broken leg can bring casseroles, while a mental illness can bring warning letters from the lawyers of your neighbors.

What's the difference, according to one of the parents interviewed? "Sympathy."

Watch the clip here: http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/nowhere-to-go-mentally-ill-youth-in-crisis

On Glee, Odd Behavior, and - Schizophrenia?

Today's post comes courtesy of Ben Behind His Voices reader - and fellow Mom and blogger - Kari Larson. She wrote to me about a recent episode of Glee that I had also watched....and noticed Sue Sylvester's line of dialogue that compares character Blaine's new interest (talking with puppets) to that of someone "with schizophrenia and off meds"

I had noticed it, but it didn't really hit me as insulting because...well, hey, this is Glee, where they exaggerate pretty much everything and nothing is really off limits. Everyone acts erratically on Glee, and eventually they usually redeem themselves with some lesson following the farce.

But my son Ben doesn't watch Glee, so he had no reaction to the episode. Kari, however, wrote about a different experience. 

Hi Randye,

My daughter is 17 and has schizophrenia. She and I have watched Glee since the very beginning and overall it's been a show that embraces all types of people.

The most recent episodes have really upset us, and I'm wondering if some of the dialogue has come to your attention.

In one episode, the character of Marley is complaining about her ex-boyfriend's erratic behavior, that he's nice one minute and horrible the next, and says it's so "schizo."

This not only upset me because it was said in a negative way, but because it's not even correct, further perpetuating the myth that schizophrenia entails a split personality disorder. Untrue.

Another episode -- quite possibly the very next one -- has Sue Sylvester complaining that she didn't want school board members coming to the school and seeing "schizophrenia" students talking to imaginary puppets (one character had a hand puppet).

My daughter is heartbroken. I've sent Twitter comments to Ryan Murphy (Glee creator), Glee on Fox (official Glee Twitter account) and one of the executive producers. I don't expect to hear anything back, but I was wondering if any of this has come across your radar.

Thank you,
Kari Larson

In her blog(http://ninepillsaday.com/) , Kari adds: "I’m annoyed by two things. One: Schizophrenia DOES NOT MEAN split personalities. Two: Please, unless you, the writers of Glee, are headed toward a fantastic teaching moment, STOP USING THAT WORD. Stop using any form of that word. It’s insulting and, more often than not, used incorrectly."

What do you think? Glee "just joking" in the way it does for many issues, or stigma to to be protested? Does Sue Sylvester owe us an apology in a future episode? 

Radio Interview: "We All Got Issues" Show

What's going on now? Why doesn't Ben "accept" his illness? What tips help families like ours to cope? Latest interview aired today,  September 23, 2013:

What is life like with a family member who has schizophrenia?  During this episode of the "We All Got Issues" show - schizophrenia is the ISSUE.  Dr. Glenda interviews Randye Kaye, the mother of a son with schizophrenia.  Randye is also the author of "Ben Behind His Voices: One Family's Journey from the Chaos of Schizophrenia to Hope".

Here is the show - starting with the song "The Climb" setting the tone.  Dr. Glenda Clare is an empathetic, knowledgeable interviewer. 

New Caregiving Internet Radio with WeAllGotIssues on BlogTalkRadio

Amanda Bynes: Will She Become the Celebrity Face of Schizophrenia?

Amanda Bynes is in the news - again. But this time, much of the focus is on the possibility of a schizophrenia diagnosis.  I mention this to Ben, and he says, "Hmmm. Interesting." This story will not, I suspect, make a dent in Ben's insight into his own illness - not now, at least. Patience is key when you love someone with schizophrenia - along with many other qualities.

But we follow the story, to see what the media does with it.  I see Hollywood Gossip report she is on a "drug cocktail" and comment:

"I'm so glad to hear that Amanda is responding to medication (not "drugs"...these are medications to restore balance, not drugs to alter it). Yes, the big question is there: will she take the meds on her own? In my experience, probably not. Many medical reasons for that (see "anosognosia") but her parents should definitely go ahead with conservatorship. It has been a huge help for us! I blogged about this at healthyplace.com, website with great info and support."

My blogs on conservatorship have gotten the attention of Marketplace, a smart and fair show on NPR that is business-oriented, and they have invited me to be part of a show  (coming up this week) on the topic of conservatorship, with Amanda in the news and all. This same issue came to light in when Britney Spears' parents sought to help their child after bizarre behaviors in public brought attention to her possible mental illness as well.  At that time, I was booked to appear on Dr. Drew's HLN show, but got bumped by a Hurricane Irene story. This time, I hope I can be of some help on Marketplace, sharing the family view of how conservatorship can help.

I am Ben's conservator, but it doesn't mean I run his life, or control him. I am simply allowed to help him when he needs the help - and, yes, sometimes when he doesn't know he needs that help. (when schizophrenia symptoms take hold.) It's a safety net. And we need it.

Watch this blog for updates!

The Aurora Shootings: One Year Later

Tomorrow is the anniversary of the shootings in Aurora, Colorado.

Untreated schizophrenia seems to have been part of the picture of this awful tragedy,  one of the worst mass shootings in American history.

James Holmes, a young man suffering from chronic schizophrenia plotted and proceeded to carry out an attack on innocent movie goers.  

According to the Associated Press today,

Twelve people died, 70 were injured, and more than 300 fled into the night and into the arms of loved ones.

A year later, the survivors cannot forget their terror, or the injuries they suffered, or their losses. But they search for meaning, and sometimes find it: the victims whose faith has strengthened; the father who lost his son but found a cause; the couple who believe that the anniversary of a hateful act can be transformed by love.

The Huffington Post updated the story yesterday, recalling these details about shooter James Holmes' background before the event:

Citing a judge's gag order and privacy laws, those who know the most about Holmes' life in Colorado say little. But there were hints along the way that his life had taken a sharp and dangerous turn.

In March 2012, four months before the shootings, he told a classmate "about wanting to kill people ... and that he would do so when his life was over," prosecutors said in a filing.

Prosecutors also said he opened accounts at two dating websites in 2012 and wrote in his profile, "Will you visit me in prison?"

In June, about five weeks before the shootings, a psychiatrist who had been treating Holmes told a campus police officer that Holmes had made "homicidal statements" and threatened her.

Planning to Wed on Aurora Anniversary

Shooting survivors Eugene Han and Kirstin Davis say they have forgiven James E. Holmes, whose defense lawyers acknowledge was the gunman. They intend to "reclaim the date" by getting married tomorrow, the anniversary of the shootings they survived.

Meanwhile, the details remain cloudy. What are the details of James Holmes' illness, childhood, and were there warning signs that should have been heeded? What if he had been receiving treatment?

Most vitally: Could this have been prevented?

Gun control remains an issue, of course, but so does mental health treatment.

We must not sweep these issues under the table. One year is not enough - no time is ever enough - to recover emotionally from the the results of non-treatment that did not have to happen.

Call Me Crazy: You Are Not Alone in this Fight

Cast of Call Me Crazy

Lifetime is premiering a new film this Saturday at 8 PM:  

Call Me Crazy - and I can't wait to see it. I hope you will watch it too. 

Here is the description from Lifetime:

Through the five shorts named after each title character -- Lucy, Eddie, Allison, Grace and Maggie – powerful relationships built on hope and triumph raise a new understanding of what happens when a loved one struggles with mental illness. "Call Me Crazy: A Five Film" stars Academy Award® and Golden Globe® winners Jennifer Hudson, Melissa Leo and Octavia Spencer, Sarah Hyland, Sofia Vassilieva, Brittany Snow, Ernie Hudson, Jason Ritter, three-time Emmy Award®-winner Jean Smart, Lea Thompson, Oscar®-nominee Melanie Griffith and Chelsea Handler. Laura Dern, Bryce Dallas Howard, Bonnie Hunt, Ashley Judd and Sharon Maguire direct the anthology

NAMI (National Alliance of Mental Illness) is a partner in this broadcast. They have a launched a new stigma-busting initiative as part of the campaign, encouraging us all to share our stories as part of You Are Not Alone in  This Fight.

As I myself prepare to visit Ohio, New York, Louisiana, Michigan, Connecticut and Tennessee in the next few weeks to share our story for Mental Health Awareness Month, I am thrilled that the messages will reach way beyond personal travels and speeches to reach the wide viewing public. 

Here is the story I shared on the NAMI site:

My son has experienced what I later learned is a fairly typical gradual-onset  pattern toward full-blown, and heartbreaking, schizophrenia. After years of chaos, we have gone through the stages of family emotional acceptance (NAMI Family-to-Family saved us, which is why I now teach and train others to teach it) and have hope once again - but that hope is always guarded, affected by stigma, caution and some sense of loss.

One saving grace comes in realizing we are not alone. Speaking out about family experience brings mental illness into the light, where it belongs. My book Ben Behind His Voices: One Family's Journey from the Chaos of Schizophrenia to Hope was created in part to open eyes, ears and hearts to the family experience - and get schizophrenia out of the closet so we can work on paths toward mental and emotional recovery.

Bravo to Lifetime - I hope this movie can help us take another step away from stigma and toward empathy, acceptance and solutions.

Randye Kaye

"Silver Linings Playbook" and Meds: Why the Secrecy?

At the end of the movie Silver Linings Playbook, when main character Pat Peoples is about to embark on the next, happier, more stable part of his life, I think he says something to his ex-wife about doing much better because he is focused, determined, physically fit - and (shhh!)taking his meds.

I think he says this because it's muttered almost under his breath - like it's a big secret we don't need the audience to know. As if he could do it all by himself without those nasty "drugs".

Really? Most of the one-out-of-four families who deal with mental illness will say that, while all those other elements of recovery are also essential (love, purpose, helping others, exercise, structure) , they could be entirely useless without the medications that stabilize the brain. Albeit not perfectly.

Does Pat Peoples Take Meds in Silver Linings Playbook ?

One quote from the book:

"...a woman who knows all my secrets, a woman who knows just how messed up my mind is, how many pills I'm on, and yet she allows me to hold her anyway",

suggests that Pat did, after initial resistance (which we see in the film), take his medications (which we might see in the film, but it's left unclear).

How nice it would be if people like my son Ben, diagnosed with schizophrenia, could see a movie hero who learns to accept that his meds do help, openly swallow them in the movie, and acknowledge that they have been part of his recovery.

Thank You, Pharma Companies and Reps

In the past year, I've had the honor several times of addressing pharmaceutical reps to tell them how much their work matters. These reps have, well, a bum rap. The face stigma of their own, portrayed as money-hungry, aggressive, pill-pushers. I speak to them in my keynote asauthor and Mom, tell our story, and remind them that that without new developments in medication - which it is their job to make available - my son might not be where he is in life.

One comment from a recent attendee:

"Your story inspired our entire sales force to continue working hard to 'bring value to life' for patients and caregivers alike.  I can’t begin to tell you how moved other members of the company from other sales divisions were to hear your story—it really helped put a face on schizophrenia and the many challenges and hurdles faced by all concerned."

So - if you research, develop, work for access, make available, or otherwise help to bring new meds to people like my son - thank you. Keep at it, because many of these meds could certainly be improved. But you give our family hope.

Even if my son still feels he needs to hide the fact that medication is part of his recovery. Even if he wants to think all the success is due to his own willpower and drive.

Recovery Needs Many Things - Internal and External

I am a big fan of drive, exercise, community, purpose, and a positive attitude. But, where mental illness is concerned, those qualities are usually not enough - not without meds, especially in people as young as my son.

Maybe, someday, there will be a popular movie that, loud and proud, gives medical treatment some credit too.

(Still - I loved the movie.)

Mental Illness Treatment Laws: Does Connecticut Lag Behind?

The nation weeps

Weeks after the tragedy in Newtown, though facts are still to be confirmed about Adam Lanza's history, we struggle to understand how it might have been prevented - or, at least, how to help prevent it from happening again. 

First, some facts: Court-ordered hospitalization for mental illness is authorized in every state, but each state’s criteria for involuntary treatment is different. Connecticut's report card? Not so great.

“Connecticut's civil commitment laws are among the most restrictive in the nation when it comes to getting help for a loved one in psychiatric crisis,” said Kristina Ragosta, senior legislative and policy counsel for the Treatment Advocacy Center, who serves as the organization’s expert on Connecticut. Ragosta said the law is restrictive in three ways that differentiate it from states with stronger laws.

1. An individual needs to be dangerous before intervention is possible. The standard requires that the individual be a danger to self or others or a danger due to grave disability before commitment is possible.

2. The law provides no option for qualifying individuals to receive court-ordered treatment in the community. This makes Connecticut one of only six states that does not provide the option of assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) as a condition of living in the community.

3. The state’s standard does not take into consideration an individual’s past psychiatric history, such as repeated hospitalizations, and/or symptoms of psychiatric deterioration that could culminate in violence or other consequences of non-treatment."

Here is my letter to the state's bipartisan task force

Dear Committee:

I am the mother of a beautiful son who suffers from schizophrenia. "Ben" is now 30 years old, and with treatment is both a student (Dean's List) and taxpayer (employed in season at a Connecticut tourist attraction, where he interacts beautifully and appropriately with the public).

Without treatment, or when services are cut, he is a patient instead- wandering aimlessly through the halls of a psychiatric hospital until he agrees to go back on his meds. This has happened three times since Ben began his recovery phase - and each time we face the fact that he may never return to us, as there is no mandated treatment, no assisted outpatient treatment, and we his family are left holding the bag and guessing how to help him.

We have struggled to get our adult loved one help and been thwarted by the restrictive mental health treatment laws in Connecticut.

We were fortunate to get educated and supported by NAMI-CT, but other families are not so informed, and eventually feel they have no choice but to give up - and their loved ones wind up homeless, in jail, in a nursing home, or - worst - threatening others and/or acting upon delusions that are very real to them, and may include violence.

treatment works...when you can get it

While I understand that it is unclear what led to the events in Newtown, it is clear that our civil commitment laws are in need of reform.  Nancy Lanza, I will venture to guess, was left with no help, no legal right to mandate help for her son - and ended up guessing how to bind with him. In her case, she must have chosen the only thing she knew from her own childhood: target practice.

Mental Health treatment could have made all the difference.

Too many families, like ours, are left feeling helpless and unsupported. Eventually, our family was able to make educated guesses about how to help our son, because of NAMI, memoirs, and other sources of information. But not all families know how to find this info, and even we sometimes guess wrong. Trust me, no family should have to do it alone. We wind up broke, scared, frustrated, and grieving for the loss of hopes, dreams, and someone we love.

Mental health services make all the difference, and these are woefully underfunded, confusing to find, and difficult to maneuver.  The cost of not providing these services, as we saw in Newtown, is so much higher than funding them, both emotionally and yes, bottom line, financially.

The last time my son had a relapse, the government wound up paying for a seven-week hospital stay instead of part-time residential staffing that would have helped him stay stable.

You add it up.

Let's vote for our futures, and for the one in four families left dealing with mental illness all alone, and for the possibilities that can exist for those who receive treatment (assisted as needed) and support services.

We need a Kendra's law in Connecticut. It might have helped us so many times - and it might have helped those in Newtown.

You can read more about our story in my book, Ben Behind His Voices: One Family's Journey from the Chaos of Schizophrenia to Hope. or I will be happy to come and tell you in person.

Thank you.

Conversation Crossroad Interview

Here is the latest radio conversation about mental health, family support, the tragic (and possibly preventable) Newtown shootings, and more. So many issues.

Listen to internet radio with conxroad on Blog Talk Radio

The Tragic Newtown Shooting: Attention Must Be Paid

The horrors of 9/11 got us into wars overseas, and the memories continued to be used to justify our involvement there. Will the tragedy in Newtown get us into a war against easy access to assault weapons, underfunded mental health services,  stalled research, and lack of support?

Never Forget. Act to Prevent.

Details continue to unfold about what might have contributed to the horrific incidents Friday in my neighboring town of Newtown, CT.

It is beyond comprehension, yet we struggle to find some threads that might prevent a repeat of it.

Many will, I hope and pray, start to listen and make changes to some of the issues involved: smarter gun control, earlier detection of mental health problems, and more access to (and insistence upon) treatment for those problems.

As we struggle to "search for solutions" (this week's topic on Good Morning America), I hope we also get to find out what Adam Lanza's mother, Nancy, had struggled with.

• Did she try to get help for her son, only to be denied because he was "legally an adult, and there's nothing we can do now"?

• Was she left with no choice but to home-school her son after he dropped out of high school?

• Was she lost in a desperate attempt to hang on to some sort of bonding with a son she loved, but was losing to mental illness? (in her case, by teaching him about guns, taking to shooting ranges)

• Did she even know how to navigate the confusing world of mental health services, only to find no road map, no support, no funding?

• Did the stigma and blame of having a son with mental health problems keep them isolated and feeling there was no community left for them?

All of these things were true for us, at times. We had to, have to, fight every step of the way to get help, support, understanding. We are lucky. Ben's nature is sweet and peace-loving. Even his "grand delusions" when in psychosis were about writing the perfect poem that will create world peace. Also, we found help and community in NAMI, and Ben got support from an ICCD clubhouse, a residential facility, outpatient treatment, and newer medications that had not existed decades ago.

But the truth of the matter is that too many familes (like, I suspect, the Lanzas) simply give up before they can find help and support. They are left to "fix it themselves." Too many families are wiped out financially (as we were), emotionally (as we often were) and socially (as we sometimes were) before they find new paths to recovery. To help these families, I wrote our book, "Ben Behind His Voices", and advocate for the kind of help that might have prevented Adam Lanza from committing the most horrific crime the world could ever imagine.

I don't "know for sure" (Oprah phrase) that this tragedy could have been prevented. But, as the mother of someone who has a mental illness and has managed to find hope, I can't help but wonder - no, suspect - that the answer is yes. This did not have to happen.

We must all fight for understanding, research, funding of services, turning stigma into treatment, and supporting the families who are, too often, ill-prepared to fight mental illness alone.